Angelica Rokad

Call: 2014


Angelica is a barrister at Six Pump Court with a broad common law practice. She undertakes advisory and litigation work in courts and tribunals for a range of clients, including Government departments, local authorities and global and national companies in the FTSE 100.

Angelica joined Chambers in 2018 following successful completion of her pupillage. Prior to the Bar, Angelica worked as a paralegal at Mischon de Reya and Charles Russell Speechlys. She also has experience working as a County Court advocate, appearing in over sixty civil applications, possession and Stage 3 disposal hearings across London and the South Eastern Circuits.

Having studied law, Angelica was awarded a distinction in her postgraduate law degree. Now in practice, Angelica lectures to students studying the Planning and Property Law module at her former University, University College London. She speaks conversational Spanish and is embarking on learning Italian.



Law, University of Southampton (Upper Second Class)

Masters of Law (Public Law), University College London (Distinction)

Bar Professional Training Course, Kaplan Law School (Very Competent)



Harmsworth Scholarship, Middle Temple Inn

Shortlisted entry, The Law Society’s “Graham Turner Human Rights Essay Competition 2015”



CPS Level 1 Advocate Panel 2016-2020 (London and South-Eastern Circuits)


Angelica delivers training for planning officers, providing them with practical advice when giving evidence at inquiries, most recently speaking at the Royal Town Planning Institute and for students at UCL.


Employment Law

Angelica has a growing employment practice and has been instructed to represent and both Claimants and Respondents both in the Employment Tribunals and draft grounds of appeal in the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

She has experience of multi-day breach of contract, unfair dismissal, and discrimination claims – the latter of which she has a particular interest in, having volunteered for the Free Representation Unit (FRU) as an Employment Tribunal Representative. During her time with FRU, Angelica appeared at full contested hearings on behalf of individuals without access to legal representation.

Notable cases include:


  • Instructed by Claimant on a multi day constructive unfair dismissal and maternity/pregnancy discrimination claim (judgment pending).

A Director v A Director

  • Instructed to act for the Claimant director in a case concerning employment status and unfair dismissal, following a breakdown of a personal relationship (judgment pending).

JP v A University

  • Instructed by Claimant on a multi-day unfair dismissal claim against a UK University (judgment pending).

AM v An Academy

  • Acted for the successful Claimant on a multi-day claim, involving a gross misconduct dismissal, where the allegation concerned hitting a child;
  • Following cross-examination, the Tribunal unanimously concluded that the Claimant did not carry out the act in question.

GD v A Care Home

  • Instructed for the Respondent in a claim involving dismissal of an employee for gross misconduct, following a death in a care home;
  • Successfully defended the substantive unfair dismissal claim and persuaded Tribunal to apply a 60% Polkey reduction, following a finding of procedurally unfair dismissal.

Local Authority v PS

  • Instructed by the Local Authority to respond to allegations of direct race discrimination and harassment in a multi-day trial (reserved judgment pending).

LB v A News Corporation (pre-Issue)

  • Instructed to draft Grounds of Complaint on behalf of a Claimant who sought to claim unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and unlawful deduction of wages against an international news broadcasting corporation and a celebrity news presenter.

DR v TC 

  • Acted for the successful Claimant in a full-day preliminary hearing where the issue included failure to issue within time, despite an admission from the Claimant that he was in receipt of legal advice on the topic.

MM v W 

  • Instructed on behalf of the successful Claimant who sought to resist a claim of litigation privilege over emails which had been obtained in breach of his employer’s internet policy but which directly discussed his ‘exit’ from the company.

T v SMT Ltd 

  • Acting for the successful Respondent in a multi-day direct discrimination and racial harassment trial; the Tribunal having concluded that the Claimant was an “unreliable witness” following inconsistencies outlined in cross-examination.

V v ARC 

  • Successfully persuaded the ET that C’s disability did not fall within the Equality Act 2010 on account of it being associated with work pressures and external influences, and thus, not a long term impairment.

A Costs Hearing 

  • Instructed on behalf of the Respondent employer seeking an award of wasted costs against the Claimant or her solicitors following strike out of her claim at Preliminary Hearing.



Angelica has experience of planning law and has been instructed as sole Counsel to represent parties at inquiry-level, where the issues include enforcement notice appeals and draft Pre-Action Protocol Letters in respect of planning judicial review claims.

Angelica receives regular instructions to prosecute cases on behalf of local authorities, which include first appearances, full trials and sentencing hearings, in the Crown and Magistrates’ Court.

She has experience of cases involving: residential fly-tipping; breach of planning enforcement notices; unauthorised works to listed buildings, protecting rights to “quiet enjoyment” of land and appealing abatement notices. .

Notable cases include:

S v LBB (Harrow Crown Court)

  • Prosecuted a four-day breach of planning enforcement trial – subsequently obtained a guilty verdict – subsequently obtained a fine of £24,000;

S v LBN (Barkingside Magistrates’ Court)

  • Instructed at sentencing hearing, following a guilty plea – subsequently obtained a fine of over £10,000;

Opinion (LB v Local Authority)

  • Advised on the merits of challenging a large scale residential development which had been included in Local Plans, amidst significant controversy.
  • The Land sought to be appropriated for the development is currently subject to an Act of Parliament protecting its use as pleasure grounds for the benefit of the public.


Civil Law

Angelica has experience of representing clients, both Claimant and Defendant, in small, fast and multi-track cases and case management hearings.

Notable examples of Angelica’s work include:

LB v RVA (Central London County Court)

  • Instructed on behalf of the Respondent, Lili Baston, and successfully resisted Appellant’s application to appeal judgment of the County Court;
  • Click here for news coverage of the case.

M v EW Ltd Co (Milton Keynes County Court)

  • Successfully set aside a judgment obtained in default, which had been escalated to the High Court for enforcement.
  • The application was a complex one given that the Claimant sought to rely on the production of fraudulent documents by the Defendant, which was, in part, accepted by the Judge determining the matter.
  • Angelica also secured a favourable costs order following the hearing.

M v V (Cambridge County Court)

  • Successfully represented an applicant who sought an ex-parte interim civil injunction pursuant to the Protection of Harassment Act 1997, later upheld on the return date.
  • Upon breach of the final injunction being proven, the respondent was duly imprisoned.


Criminal Law

Angelica spent five months of her pupillage with Simon Taylor observing trials where the offences included manslaughter and kidnapping.

Angelica regularly appears in the Crown and Magistrates’ Court undertaking trials and in the Crown Court, prosecuting and defending committals for sentence and appeals against conviction and sentence.

Angelica is currently instructed by a Local Authority to prosecute in a multi-day trial involving unlawful eviction and harassment of tenants in the Crown Court.

Notable examples of Angelica’s work include:

R v C (Canterbury Crown Court)

  • Advised client to appeal against a sentence of a 12 month DTO for multiple offences on the grounds that the Youth Court imposed an excessive sentence, in light of the mitigating factors which were present;
  • On appeal, the Court were persuaded to impose a YRO ISSP instead of a custodial sentence, with immediate effect;
  • A link to the case can be found here

R v S (Medway Magistrates’ Court)

  • Secured an acquittal for a Defendant charged with four counts of assault by beating, where the Prosecution evidence included two independent witnesses. The Magistrates’ acquitted on the basis of inconsistencies outlined during cross-examination.

Kent Police v Grant (Folkestone Magistrates’ Court)

  • Successfully obtained a final closure order of a premises, following a police operation to respond to antisocial behaviour linked to county line drug supply.
  • See press report

R v Dabner (Canterbury Crown Court)



“The ambit of procedural fairness in closed material proceedings: Rahmutullah v Ministry of Defence [2017] EWHC 547 (QB) and K (and Others) v Secretary of State for Defence [2017] EWHC 830 (Admin)”, Civil Justice Quarterly, 2017

“Appeal by witness: substantive and procedural landmines, breach of convention rights and the unusual case of Re W (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Non Party Appeal) [2016] EWCA Civ 1140”, Civil Justice Quarterly, 2018


Public Access Scheme

Angelica Rokad is qualified to accept direct instructions from members of the public under the Public Access Scheme.

Information about the Public Access Scheme and how it works can be found on our Public Access page.

Certain specific Public Access services are subject to price and service transparency regulatory requirements. By clicking the link below you will be directed to the required information for those specific categories of work in respect of which Angelica accepts instructions.

Employment Tribunal Cases (advice and representation for employers and employees)


latest news